Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : Is it me or is IceWM+a background d@mn slow?


MBMarduk
06-15-2001, 08:34 AM
First off: The newest IceWM 1.8.6 is a beauty and fast a ever.

I just don't feel comfy putting up a background .xpm or .jpg or something else 'cuz starting takes forever.
And don't even get me started on moving transparent ATerms! FUGGLY!

Can anyone else corroborate this for me?

It's a P200MMX /w 64MB EDO.

cga
06-15-2001, 01:50 PM
I never use big background images. They always seem to consume resources. A simple, tiled patern is my choice. Looks nice, is not distracting and does not eat resources.

ifred
06-17-2001, 01:07 AM
No it's not just you. I have also noticed a slowdown in load times when Ice is used with a large background image. Then I switched to Blackbox . . . had a change of heart and now use Ice with drab, monochrome backgrounds. Function over form in this case.

MBMarduk
06-18-2001, 07:50 AM
Originally posted by ifred:
<STRONG>...now use Ice with drab, monochrome backgrounds. Function over form in this case.</STRONG>

'zactly what I've always done.

BTW, does anyone know another transparent 'term that renders the background faster?
I mean besides Eterm 0.8.10 and Aterm 0.4.0? These 2 are too slow to "fool" the eye that it's transparent (on my box atleast).

TIA,
-Mike